The irony of primary parent laws is that on the one hand feminists were arguing for women’s equal rights to jointly-created career assets that emanated from the male financial womb, but arguing against men’s equal rights to jointly-created children that emanated from the woman’s child-bearing womb. - Warren Farrell

Men for whom divorce means walking out of their Read more
In brief, she is the partner to what primarily he Read more
I soon saw that feminists who supported the Read more
As feminism made this transition from equal Read more
Feminists often discuss women having two jobs: Read more
In brief, when a man fails as a wallet, we put Read more
In a democracy, a government’s policies are r Read more
Raising children was not designed for single Read more
When a government requires a man to support a Read more
If we penalize mothers for denial of Read more
Men are socialized to trust women until evidence Read more
Our children are better served by speaking not of Read more
We would not think of allowing a man to determine Read more
When we speak of mom winning custody or of dad Read more
It is ironic that a movement that made its Read more
“Visitation” reflects the era of the absentee fat Read more
We are at a unique moment in history -- when a Read more
When a parent denies a child its “parent time,” Read more
A woman has no right to a unilateral choice that Read more
From a woman’s perspective, sharing parent time f Read more
Is a man’s body at stake? Any time a man is a Read more
If Women Have An Equal EMPLOYMENT Opportunity Read more